Will the NYT review of "Dune: Part Two" include both the words "indigenous" and "colonialist"?
43
830Ṁ4526
resolved Feb 29
Resolved
YES

This market resolves YES if the first review (logged by Rotten Tomatoes) from the New York Times for "Dune: Part Two" uses both the words "indigenous" and "colonialist" in the text or title of the review.

For reference, the NYT (Manohla Dargas) review for "Dune" (2021) used both words:

drew from an astonishment of sources, from Greek mythology to Indigenous cultures...

The shadow of Lawrence of Arabia and colonialist fantasies does loom large,

Any close variants (or any spelling) of the same root word will count.

Some starting examples:

  • "Colonialism", "colonial", "colonialists", "colonist", "colonizer", "indigenousness", & etc would be variants of the same root words, and they would all count.

  • However, the word "colony" is a separate word with its own meaning (it can just describe place, separate from the colonialist structure), and it would not count.

  • “Native” has a similar meaning to “indigenous”, but it’s a different word, and would not count.

If any scenarios for resolution are unclear, please ask (and I'll add them to the examples).

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ778
2Ṁ114
3Ṁ51
4Ṁ45
5Ṁ41
© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy