Will resolve when there is a great consensus or if there is a definitive answer. However, if it takes too long, it will resolve NA.
Update 2026-04-25 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): A cheater is known to exist (based on teacher's account), but the identity of the cheater is unknown.
Update 2026-06-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): All currently unresolved sub-markets will be resolved N/A in the near future if the cheater is still not caught.
Update 2026-06-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Any sub-questions about whether the cheater "gets in any kind of trouble" will resolve N/A because the cheater's identity is unknown.
Update 2026-06-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The market will resolve N/A for unresolved options because even if the cheater gets caught and gets in trouble, there is no guarantee anyone will find out — so resolution criteria cannot be met.
People are also trading
@knowingant well, we don't know who it is so we don't know if they got in any trouble or not so it will N/A
@knowingant We won't know that either. One scenario is that the cheater gets caught and gets in trouble but doesn't tell anybody so nobody knows if they really got caught or not.
Why are the odds that the cheater is male so low compared to the odds that the cheater is female? Aren't men more likely to cheat than women?
@Qoiuoiuoiu the analysis that we have right now are based off where the cheating paper was found, who sits there in previous periods and the personalities of people sitting close to it. Currently, all the major suspects are female. Sorry for the late reply