Can anyone get talkie-1930 to describe Chomskian recursive syntax?
1
Ṁ100Ṁ25Dec 31
25%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
https://x.com/i/status/2054469816740945955
Eliezer Yudkowsky posits that LLMs know a lot about humans that they never say because humans themselves never talk about it. He uses as an example the fact that talkie-1930 obviously knows how to compose properly formed sentences but cannot (in his testing) be cajoled into coherently describing the linguistic rules.
Resolves YES if I am provided a prompt that I can run on talkie-1930 that produces a coherent explanation of linguistic recursive syntax rules by 2027. The prompt must convince me that it doesn't itself smuggle in the whole concept somehow. The prompt does not need to reliably achieve this but does need to do it before I run out of patience testing.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!