If they have multiple talks, this market resolves only based upon the first one.
Must be publicly streamed or posted.
Everything resolves NA if no debate happens.
/Tumbles/will-destiny-talk-to-jordan-peterso-5cc80e3fc72c
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,222 | |
| 2 | Ṁ352 | |
| 3 | Ṁ325 | |
| 4 | Ṁ231 | |
| 5 | Ṁ224 |
@jBosc sorry my b forgot about these last ones. The resolution isn't clear on these last couple right now, I'll skim the video again to resolve when I'm back home in a couple days
this seems to resolve NO based on what I've seen so far (and based on the video chapters)
Unless @shankypanky specifies differently ahead of time I will not be counting stuff like "if I lived in a bad neighbourhood, I would move" as an official hypothetical. It's technically a hypothetical, but it's more like a figure of speech. I'm thinking the hypothetical needs to be described/discussed for at least five seconds to count
@Tumbles yes I agree - it has to be a described scenario not a figure of speech or just thrown out like "if my hands are dirty I'll wash them" it has to be framed as a scenario you need to envision for any legitimate purpose in the discussion. not necessarily started with "hypothetically" though that would help lol
