I reserve the rights to NA any added options.
Clarification: gpt2-chatbot include the three variants, i.e. gpt2-chatbot, "i-am-a-good-gpt2-chatbot", and "i-am-also-a-good-gpt2-chatbot"
related market:
Related questions
@benshindel The word "a single model" is used to show the difference to previous multimodal solutions, where for vision, people assembled a CLIP with an LLM through projection, and for audio, people used three models that go speech-to-text (Whisper), text reasoning (GPT4), and TTS at the output end.
@chrisjbillington It might make sense to resolve GPT-5 to NO now, but do we really have any idea what Q* is and how it is definitely not GPT4o?
@Sss19971997 If you're resolving stuff, "It is close to GPT-2 (e.g., the same architecture but with different instruction tuning)" should probably also resolve NO.
The system prompt says it's October 2023. (I just ran a few tests to confirm, and it's guesses about events after that point were complete hallucinations.)
@MugaSofer I am debating if I should resolve according to GPT4o or wait till we find out what the other two variants (gpt2-chatbot, i-am-a-good-gpt2-chatbot) are?
@MugaSofer For example, what if any of the two variants have a later knowledge cutoff? (though very unlikely)
@Sss19971997 Obviously it would benefit me to have it resolved immediately.
How would you resolve it if some fit the criterion and some didn't? (For any question.) You did already resolve several options based on things that we only know for sure apply to one of the models.
@Sss19971997 In that case you're safe to resolve YES; at least the main variant's knowledge cutoff "is in or before Jan 2024".
@Sss19971997 I mean Sam Altman specifically said it wasn't. It'll be strange if other markets about it resolve YES.
@Sss19971997 Mira's market's definition is very broad and would have included new models in the GPT-4 family even if they were downgrades in capabilities. Mira is betting NO in similar markets.