Will Manifold do something to incentivize participating in long term markets in the next 30 days?
27
แน€300
resolved Jul 24
Resolved
NO
Resolves NO if at resolution nothing has been done to incentivize participating in long term markets.
Get แน€200 play money

๐Ÿ… Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1แน€108
2แน€105
3แน€93
4แน€82
5แน€76
Sort by:
predicted NO
Safe to say nothing was done to solve this yet.
What about compound interest? It's a standard mechanism to incentivize people to buy long-term instruments. Essentially, the principal and all payouts would get compounded yearly or something.
@athenaciara I think it makes far too small of a difference to really matter Let's say I have M$100 and I think I can bet it to make an average of M$5 in profits on any given market. If I bet in a series of markets that each last a week, then over the course of 52 weeks in a year, I can make 52 * 5 = M$260 in profit (and I'm ignoring the fact that my profits compound over time, which would potentially let me make even more profits). On the other hand, if I bet my M$100 in a single market that lasts for a year, I get M$5 in profit. Now, let's say the year-long market pays 10% annual interest rate (which would be pretty high by comparison to the financial markets). Then I get an additional M$10 in interest, for a total of M$15. This is nothing compared to the M$260 from making 52 week-long bets. Link to some previous discussion on it: https://manifold.markets/jack/how-should-manifold-encourage-tradi#answer-4
I think the loans idea that was discussed about a month ago is great, I hope it gets implemented sometime soon!
predicted NO
@jack It was implemented and killed.
@M You're talking about loans v1 (M$20 loan per market) which was added and removed some months ago. There was a loans v2 proposal (loan back a percentage of your investment every week) which is still a draft: https://github.com/manifoldmarkets/manifold/pull/588
predicted NO
@jack You can increase the interest to something meaningful and reflective of the opportunity cost!
@MP In theory yes, but in practice I doubt it. If you use the numbers from my example, you'd need interest rates of 200%+. That's insanely high. And it doesn't incentivize good bets - if you are getting massive 200%+ interest rates, then you don't need to make a good bet in a long-term market, you just need to make any bet and you'll get a pretty decent return. Reducing the capital costs i.e. increasing leverage i.e. loans seems like a much more effective way to achieve what we want, and it's incentive aligned - you get the same profits, but you don't have to lock up as much capital to do it.
The way I think of it is, your opportunity cost is the amount of M$ you invest times length of time it's invested. Putting M$100 into a year-long investment is 52x the opportunity cost of putting M$100 into a week-long investment. Loans help reduce the opportunity cost for longer duration markets to make this less bad.
predicted NO
@jack The opportunity cost is lower than that. You'll lose money is many bets. The way I see it is that all bets should have interest, but it should be higher to longer term bets.
bought แน€6 of NO
They even killed loan feature after implementing it...
bought แน€100 of YES
Lots of chatter on Discord about this, probably would be better discussed as a long term markets group in the discussion tab. Sounds like James is intent on implementing something
predicted NO
@ian I like the idea of a group!
bought แน€20 of NO
I think it is not an easy problem to solve
bought แน€10 of NO
I think it's important but I want them to try something different to the last time (loans) for gathering more data.
bought แน€10 of NO
Betting NO to incentivize Manifold to act on this.
bought แน€10 of NO
@SneakySly Ditto. I feel like thereโ€™s not much to incentivize markets that close in >1 month now
bought แน€20 of YES
Wait I thought betting yes would show them that the community thinks it's important?
predicted NO
@ahalekelly Thereโ€™s more mana for the implementer to collect if you bet โ€œNOโ€
predicted YES
@bcongdon sure, but I don't think there's enough mana in this market to meaningfully incentivize someone to implement it
predicted YES
And this is the opposite to how feature markets work, right? https://manifold.markets/Gurkenglas/suggest-features