
If Redwood Research releases an ELK benchmark paper, will I think it's great backchained empirical alignment research?
8
130Ṁ484resolved Sep 6
Resolved
YES1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Resolved according to my subjective judgement.
This is roughly as described here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/DwoPGM8ytBCXrZpM7/backchaining-in-strategy
By 'great backchained empirical alignment research', I both mean the research is good and that it benefited from carefully reasoning through the alignment problem and possible approaches. This particularly includes thinking about the future situation we'll be in during high risk periods.
Resolves to n/a if no such paper is released in 1 year.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ61 | |
2 | Ṁ48 | |
3 | Ṁ20 | |
4 | Ṁ10 | |
5 | Ṁ5 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will >= 1 alignment researcher/paper cite "maximum diffusion reinforcement learning" as alignment-relevant in 2025?
19% chance
Will I still work on alignment research at Redwood Research in 5 years?
49% chance
Will I still work on alignment research at Redwood Research in 3 years?
70% chance
By 2028, will I think Redwood Research has been net-good for the world?
83% chance