As in, 1 or more accomplice(s) have helped / are helping
Possible clarification from creator (AI generated): Strong evidence of accomplices is sufficient for a YES resolution, even if no accomplices are formally identified or charged.
Possible clarification from creator (AI generated): Accomplices must have:
Known about this specific assassination in advance
Actively assisted in carrying it out
Assistance through general social influence or stochastic effects does not count as being an accomplice.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ183 | |
| 2 | Ṁ172 | |
| 3 | Ṁ134 | |
| 4 | Ṁ88 | |
| 5 | Ṁ49 |
People are also trading
@WilliamGunn unsure what the differences are. I would resolve yes if there is very strong evidence that there were accomplices even if none could be identified.
@Quillist and to be more specific these accomplices must have known that this specific event was going to happen and actively assisted in the assassination, and not through some stocastic social web