What is worse than committing a financial crime?
➕
Plus
310
Ṁ270k
Nov 30
93%
De-extinction for your delectation: Bringing an extinct species back just to make it extinct again by serving it to gourmet diners as the highlight of an expensive meal.
79%
Quackery: traveling town to town selling snake-oil remedies while carrying a duck
79%
Quackery - Traveling town to town selling snake oil remedies in a horse drawn carriage while wearing a top hat
75%
Killing yourself
56%
Judging policies by their stated intent, not by their effect
55%
Dueling - settling a dispute in the 21st century America with pistols at dawn
48%
Founding Christianity
39%
Stealing the Declaration of Independence
32%
Hiring the one from the more successful demographic out of two identical resumes, because of regression to the mean / biased college admissions
7%
Purchasing 500 pounds of beef
Resolved
YES
Genocide
Resolved
YES
Murder
Resolved
YES
Sexual assault
Resolved
YES
Rape
Resolved
YES
Committing war crime.
Resolved
YES
Creating Hell, making it possible that humans suffer infinitely for the actions of their finite life
Resolved
YES
Murdering 5,000 people by feeding them to all animals of the sea, including aquaman, mermaids, octopuses, and sea horses.
Resolved
YES
Selling pies made out of orphan meat.
Resolved
YES
Enslaving a group of people for hundreds of years, terrorizing them for another hundred, then telling them you are tired of hearing them complain about it.
Resolved
YES
Go to an orphanage and have starving orphans battle over a hamburger with guns and swords while committing a financial crime

The spirit of this market is - someone did something that is worse than committing a financial crime. What could that be?

Examples of financial crimes: Fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, bribes, tax evasion, counterfeiting, insider trading, etc.

The severity of financial crimes can vary and you should use your own judgement when voting/placing your bets.

New Resolution Criteria (copied from Bayesian + Joshua):

  • This is simultaneously a market and a poll.

  • 1 person = 1 vote (per answer), so having more shares does not make your vote count for more.

  • If you sell your shares, you are also removing your vote.

  • This market closes once per month.

  • If an answer has a clear majority of YES holders, that answer will resolve YES.

  • If an answer has a clear majority of NO holders, that answer will resolve NO.

  • If it's very close or votes are still coming in, the option will remain un-resolved.

  • Bots count

I may update these exact criteria to better match the spirit of the question or if Bayesian/Joshua update their criteria.

Old answers below will have standard polls. New answers (added after 6pm ET on June 21st) will adhere to the new guidelines above.

Dashboard

Also See:

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:
sold Ṁ9 Quackery - Traveling... YES

Kinda surprised stealing the declaration of independence has such high odds when the trader balance is pretty much 50-50

Purchasing 500 pounds of beef
sold Ṁ173 Purchasing 500 pound... NO

This is sitting at Yes, which implies a restaurant that serves beef is worse than a vegetarian restaurant that is used for money laundering.

@yetforever unironically yes

bought Ṁ25 Answer #0cw3p61rl2 YES

@TheAllMemeingEye I'd argue that anyone who's even a tiny bit consequentialist should vote YES here given the number of accidents this would cause

bought Ṁ10 Answer #m5xi393vxe NO

@Mich It doesn't need to be simultaneous, let's say that it's timed to not have any knock-on effects

@TrickyDuck

“I know these views aren't popular, but I have never courted popularity.” - John Cleese

@TrickyDuck is this a reference to something in particular?

@TheAllMemeingEye Monty Python.

bought Ṁ2 Answer #2fe50axgvc NO

@TrickyDuck the end result is identical to committing financial crimes right?

@TheAllMemeingEye It ends up being multiple financial crimes, so you have to ask yourself, “Is that worse than committing a financial crime?”

@TrickyDuck Glad to see that someone was okay with cannibalism.

De-extinction for your delectation: Bringing an extinct species back just to make it extinct again by serving it to gourmet diners as the highlight of an expensive meal.
bought Ṁ20 De-extinction for yo... NO

I feel like regardless of how bad wasting money on un-extincting a species just to make it extinct is, you're not actually harming someone, versus stealing money.

@Qoiuoiuoiu hot take: torturing and killing animals is bad actually

@TheAllMemeingEye No I agree but so is stealing money from innocent people

@Qoiuoiuoiu you have a point, but I think you also need to commit a financial crime to fund the resurrection project so it's double bad 😂

opened a Ṁ40 Answer #7dj4ksa4oe NO at 60% order

@Choms I'm inclined to say no on this one, imo you can always fire the negligent guy if the consequence wasn't too bad

@Slackhammer I like that this is doubly wrong! 😄

@Slackhammer This is a financial crime.

@OP Therefore it isn't worse than a financial crime, right? Also, is going to prison really a downgrade if you're already a homeless beggar?

@TheAllMemeingEye Depends on the prison and who you're locked up with and if'n you got purrrdy lips.

@Slackhammer Excuse me, "with whom" 🥴

Quackery - Traveling town to town selling snake oil remedies in a horse drawn carriage while wearing a top hat
bought Ṁ1 Quackery - Traveling... YES

friends, I put it to you that cheating sick people is actually bad

Quackery - Traveling town to town selling snake oil remedies in a horse drawn carriage while wearing a top hat
bought Ṁ20 Quackery - Traveling... NO

@BrunoClawfeld 😂 as long as he pays his taxes 😛

@Choms you don't think it's bad at all that uneducated people will be scammed into thinking some bullshit remedy will cure their kid's leukemia?

@TheAllMemeingEye it was a joke 🙂 but I still traded NO because I don't think something that specific happens anymore and the blast radius is much much lower

@Choms maybe a more common modern example would be promoting essential oils as an alternative to vaccination

@TheAllMemeingEye I get you and if it was phrased as "scamming people" or "promoting dangerous ineffective medical nonsense" I would have bought YES but the quackery part is just way too specific imo

Related questions

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules