Luigi Mangione UnitedHealthcare Shooter likes the following stereotypical things:
➕
Plus
49
Ṁ7157
Jan 9
74%
IQ
71%
Longevity
66%
Richard Stallman
62%
Elon Musk
48%
Neon Genesis Evangelion
47%
e/acc
46%
Red Scare
42%
Curtis Yarvin NRx
41%
Breaking Points
39%
Bitcoin Maximalist
30%
Chris Chan
30%
Veganism
26%
Terry Davis
23%
Kanye West
21%
Mishima
20%
Vaush or Hasan Piker
Resolved
YES
IR and its consequences is bad
Resolved
YES
SSC ACX
Resolved
YES
EA
Resolved
YES
Norm Macdonald

All answers default no, must be positive proof. If there is conflicting evidence, most recent chronologically rules regardless. Satire defaults to endorsement unless extreme evidence otherwise.

  • Update 2024-10-12 (PST): - References to IR and its consequences will be interpreted as agreeing with Ted Kaczynski's position, as the phrase inherently implies a negative view of the Industrial Revolution (AI summary of creator comment)

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

If he had even mentioned the name Emil at one point I’m resolving IQ yea

bought Ṁ500 YES

@PaulHan yeah it's starting to get creepy

what did he mean by this

Is there evidence of Luigi being interested in IQ?

Resolving ACX as yes due to him subscribing to it on substack and resolving Norm MacDonald as yes due to his use of the doghouse joke on a tweet. Bring in more evidence please!

bought Ṁ50 YES

@spiderduckpig Doesn't this imply that he dislikes the industrial revolution and its consequences?

@placebo_username Well I assume the question is referring to if he likes the text titled "Industrial Revolution and it's Consequences," not that he likes the Industrial Revolution itself

@spiderduckpig I don't know of any text by that title. The Kaczynski manifesto is titled "Industrial Society and its Future."

@PaulHan Can you clarify?

@placebo_username You're right, it's actually the first few words in the text that read "The industrial revolution and its consequences," still pretty sure that's what the question is referring to though

@spiderduckpig I suppose incipits for religious texts are an ancient tradition... but usually Consequences would be capitalized in that case. I still think my literal reading makes more sense.

@placebo_username Daniel a man died

@PaulHan Please do clarify. The two interpretations of the answer are obviously extremely different.

@PaulHan Yes, it's very sad. But I don't think leaving this answer ambiguous will bring much comfort to his family.

@jskf You’re being a turboautist. Normies know that manifesto by the opening lines, not the actual title. It’s clear what he meant.

@FoxKHTML If it was in quotes/mentioned Ted Kaczynski it wouldn't be a problem. The issue is that quoting the line would also be a mildly amusing way to invert the answer. When I first read it I knew what it was referencing, but I still wasn't sure which interpretation was intended.

@jskf Just use common sense, my man

@FoxKHTML This is not at all a matter of common sense, both interpretations would make perfect sense.

@PaulHan He gave it 4 stars. I think this is strong enough positive proof he enjoyed Industrial Society and Its Future

@placebo_username Daniel is wrong

@PaulHan So then please edit the answer to make it clear. Thanks!

bought Ṁ50 YES

@PaulHan Why not resolve "IR and its consequences" to YES then?

@FoxKHTML is correct because if one were to acknowledge the existence of the phrase IR and its consequences it would only be in relation to agreeing with Uncle Ted’s position because the essence of the term is necessarily negative. Fox is totally right because it’s common sense and also logical. Daniel your position is not more logical just more myopic

@PaulHan to give an example, it is like recognizing the validity of the phrase “the terroristic american state” and having a positive view of america foreign policy

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules