1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ55 | |
| 2 | Ṁ52 | |
| 3 | Ṁ51 | |
| 4 | Ṁ49 | |
| 5 | Ṁ25 |
People are also trading
@Chumchulum Okay, the trade ledger and renaming history of this are all sorts of screwed up. Please tell me what's going on here, because I don't like what I'm seeing.
@Cactus @Chumchulum I see you two are the only ones who traded on this before it was renamed around. Are we cool with this actually resolving N/A? I see the conversation below, and I just want to confirm the story is straight.
@Chumchulum Overall, I will say it's bad practice to rename markets after people have traded on them if it changes the nature of what is being traded on. Please don't do this again.
But we're here now. I think N/A is the best verdict here. I'm giving you and @Cactus a final opportunity to speak. I will resolve this N/A after at least 48 hours unless I hear anything of note.
@Cactus I will anyway, as only you and I have traded on it and we are still within the 1-hour window to edit an option's title.
@- -mods what do you think of this shenanigan? I feel it cannot be allowed. The original text of the answer was that all of @Cactus answers would resolve to NO. Then changed to something totally different.
EDIT: we have resolved our dispute amicably below.
@Cactus I am not a mod, but I think we are in a meta-market, an asset class known for shenanigans, and that the market can be changed to unranked profits as many shenanigan-prone similar markets have.
I did not account when creating my option that you could invalidate the option by making a new option fulfilled only by a comment in the market, and since only we two had traded on either, I felt that it was fair within the 1 hour. This is not fraud. This is my attempt to be playful.
@Chumchulum I do not know of any scenario where changing the resolution criteria to a completely unrelated thing is allowed, even within 1hr, when another trader is present on the answer.
@Cactus This is a non-predictive metamarket where only you and I have traded on the two options of concern, with shenanigans already taking place that simply did not involve editing an option during the 1 hour that one may
EDIT: we have resolved our dispute amicably below.
@Chumchulum let's just leave it to mods to decide then. will accept whatever conclusion they come to.
@Chumchulum thank you, I accept your proposal to N/A your option. I think you may rename it to something like "resolves N/A" as we are the only traders and it does not affect other existing answers.
@Cactus Can I change it to "resolves N/A in 1 month" so that we (I) can gamble on it as a mystery option before my and all profits from it are clawed back when it N/As? As we are not the only traders, we are just the only ones present on this market today.
@Chumchulum I would take some unrealized loss this way, if you send me like M10 interest I'd be happy to register the loss and let you bet it as you please until its eventual NA resolution.
@Paul if you are still active, please note that the intention of @Chumchulum, which I assume is in good faith here, is to have his option resolve to NA, not to resolve it to NO in the event that it does not resolve to NA on the specified date.
Note that I said he may bet it as he pleases, I did not necessarily honor his request to rename to his exact requested title. This was done intentionally to prevent potential bad faith attempts. I extend the good faith here as I do not intend for him to lose mana on this answer.