I will resolve this market to the best of my ability based on public evidence provided to me by the end of March 2023. This will be purely my opinion based on publicly available evidence. I have no private information.

For this market, white supremacy is defined as item 1 here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20supremacy

the belief that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races

I am requiring both elements of this definition ("and"). One element might be implicit in an argument for the other. At least one element must be explicit.

Indirect white supremacy is included if Trump has argued for supremacy of a quantity strongly correlated with race, in both directions. An argument for Trump supremacy does not count because while most Trumps are white, most whites are not Trump.

I require a specific allegation of such an argument. Please provide such instances if you believe this market should resolve yes. In the absence of specific allegations I will resolve no.

I will ignore comments that I cannot see while logged in due to blocking, muting, etc.

I will not bet in this market. My initial credence is 50%.