@KatjaGrace

I so like the effort and thought you put in your dating doc! (I saw it before on Twitter - introduced me to the concept and made me seriously consider making one btw (and sad about the h8ters btw but nice to see it didn't make you renounce)). It's earnest and cute and nerdy and everything at once. Fun to read too!

Three things I particularly related to in that:

- "Like making and doing things with partners. Ideal scenario involves being capable and agentic partners in (non-)crime." 

- "Deeply serious and surfacely lighthearted. Queering the serious-ridiculous binary. "

- "Pro sincere enthusiasms." 

Things I think might be incompatibilities:

- Personally slightly pro-norm breaking and pro-crime/illegal conduct in a way that I intuit you might not like. Not in a "yes evil fuck yeah!" way but more in a, "free society requires the possibility of existence beyond its norms"

- I'm not convinced of AI risks. I take seriously people thoughts about it, but don't seem to reach the same conclusions. It's not a deal-breaker for me, it might be for you

- Atlantic ocean

You seem like a very "good" person - a vague one dimensional expression, but that I mean very warmly - and someone I would gladly meet up for coffee and talk, in a parallel world. But the physical distance makes this kinda very improbable to happen. Slightly sad shrug. 

@CamillePerrin Thank you!

I agree these are incompatibilities, though not deal breakers for me. You're right I'm on the norm-abiding end of things, I think further in that direction than I can justify.