Will "Why didn't we get the four-hour workday?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
1
10
Ṁ10Ṁ120
2025
13%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Why didn't we get the four-hour workday? is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "Lessons On How To Get Things Right On The Fir..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "Why Would Belief-States Have A Fractal Struct..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
40% chance
Will "The Learning-Theoretic Agenda: Status 2023" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
25% chance
Will "Basics of Rationalist Discourse" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will ""How could I have thought that faster?"" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
59% chance
Will "There is way too much serendipity" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
78% chance
Will "How useful is mechanistic interpretability?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "AI Timelines" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
83% chance
Will "Most People Don't Realize We Have No Idea How..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "How much do you believe your results?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
90% chance