Will "Weight-Sparse Circuits May Be Interpretable Y..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
1
Ṁ1kṀ5002028
9%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2026 Review resolves in February 2028.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Weight-Sparse Circuits May Be Interpretable Yet Unfaithful is one of the top fifty posts of the 2026 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "A Pragmatic Vision for Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
44% chance
Will "Defending Against Model Weight Exfiltration T..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Are We In A Coding Overhang?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "A computational no-coincidence principle" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "It's hard to make scheming evals look realist..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Scalable End-to-End Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "An Ambitious Vision for Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "How To Become A Mechanistic Interpretability ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
50% chance
Will "Musings on Reported Cost of Compute (Oct 2025)" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Small Models Can Introspect, Too" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
23% chance