Will "The case for more ambitious language model evals" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
1
25
Ṁ10Ṁ70
2026
12%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post The case for more ambitious language model evals is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "On the future of language models" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "What a compute-centric framework says about A..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
34% chance
Will "Towards Developmental Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
69% chance
Will "When can we trust model evaluations?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "Toward A Mathematical Framework for Computati..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
62% chance
Will "Discussion: Challenges with Unsupervised LLM ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "The Witness" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
10% chance
Will "The Plan - 2023 Version" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Towards Monosemanticity: Decomposing Language..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
22% chance