Will "Steering GPT-2-XL by adding an activation vector" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
6
94
Ṁ219Ṁ150
2025
58%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Steering GPT-2-XL by adding an activation vector is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "Lessons On How To Get Things Right On The Fir..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "LeCun’s “A Path Towards Autonomous Machine In..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "AI Alignment Metastrategy" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "On the future of language models" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "A Selection of Randomly Selected SAE Features" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
5% chance
Will "The Plan - 2023 Version" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "The case for more ambitious language model evals" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "OpenAI: Facts from a Weekend" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Natural Latents: The Math" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Towards Developmental Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
69% chance