Will "Scale Was All We Needed, At First" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
4
78
Ṁ45Ṁ130
2026
21%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Scale Was All We Needed, At First is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "Lessons On How To Get Things Right On The Fir..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "The Learning-Theoretic Agenda: Status 2023" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
25% chance
Will "Thoughts on responsible scaling policies and ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will "How useful is mechanistic interpretability?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "When can we trust model evaluations?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "AI Timelines" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
83% chance
Will "There is way too much serendipity" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
78% chance
Will "On green" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
83% chance
Will "Toward A Mathematical Framework for Computati..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
62% chance
Will "How much do you believe your results?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
90% chance