Will "How useful is mechanistic interpretability?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
4
Ṁ110Ṁ76resolved Feb 11
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post How useful is mechanistic interpretability? is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ8 | |
| 2 | Ṁ1 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will "How To Become A Mechanistic Interpretability ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
50% chance
Will "A Pragmatic Vision for Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
44% chance
Will "Scalable End-to-End Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Mechanisms too simple for humans to design" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
71% chance
Will "Interpretability Will Not Reliably Find Decep..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
38% chance
Will "Mech interp is not pre-paradigmatic" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "An Ambitious Vision for Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "On the functional self of LLMs" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Anthropic, and taking "technical philosophy" ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "Attribution-based parameter decomposition" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance