
Technical question. Please consider the theoretical limitations here.
Can a machine align a feeble human mind to objective truth if the human agrees to answer enough T/F questions?
The machine will get progressively better because it keeps track of every response and is insanely good at drilling down your cruxes with reality.
Update 2025-09-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Step 1: The AI presents the user with a proposition.
Step 2: The user provides a response in the form of a confidence (value between 0 and 1).
Step 3: The AI records that user's response and uses all the information it has collected to generate a new relevant proposition to be evaluated.
The AI repeatedly presents new propositions to be evaluated by the human.
This leads the human on an enlightenment journey, guiding them through the most important cruxes in philosophy.
The AI asks the questions.
Humans give answers.