
Resolves to all that are true. I will add more as the season progresses.
I may bet unless something appears or becomes subjective, in which case I will not bet. If something unexpectedly becomes subjective after I've already established a position I will outsource resolution if necessary.
I don't promise to watch so religiously that I don't miss any of these, so bettors should proactively seek resolutions, but I do promise to go back and check time stamps if provided.
I will close this set of questions the day before the finale is broadcast on Nebula, and will not resolve until it has been shown on YouTube. Obviously information will have been transferred in many markets before then, so participate at your own risk of spoilers.
Likewise individual markets will resolve after relevant evidence is on YouTube.
*Will interpret quite liberally what counts as 'someone' if there is an apple shooting challenge
** Before the finale is broadcast on Nebula. Either a link or a screenshot.
***This includes Zurich, Basel, Geneva, Bern, Lausanne and Winterthur. It refers to the municipality not the greater urban area. I will not bet.
COMMENT CLARIFICATIONS:
"I want to get out ahead of this. If we don't see footage of someone eating fondue, it won't count "
"Things we see or here during the 'outro' where the producers talk directly to camera in a studio setting do not count."
"for the season ten market I'm going to tighten this up and try and remove any ambiguity. But I think it's too late for this market so I'll just try to add layers instead:
My preference is this:
for cases which are comparable to fondue, we follow the fondue precedent and say you have to see it in the episode.
for cases where physical location is relevant, if the information we have reveals it must be true, even if we don't see it it should resolve true.
(eg if someone takes a train that briefly passes through Grisons but they don't show footage of that part, it should resolve YES)
The big caveat with this is that I've said I might outsource resolution for subjective cases where I've already bet. So unfortunately the above is as much a guide for whoever resolves this as it is a definitive statement"
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ3,280 | |
2 | Ṁ620 | |
3 | Ṁ385 | |
4 | Ṁ105 | |
5 | Ṁ96 |