Will John be the next Republican Senate leader after Mitch McConnell?
27
228
1k
2029
73%
chance

As of market creation, this market has a 64% cumulative chance that someone with the first name of John is the next Republican Leader. Sure, it only has 2 traders, but who knows!

Resolves YES if the successor of Mitch McConnell (either the next Republican majority or minority leader) has a first name of John (Jon does not count). This market will resolve NO otherwise.

Market from @JosephNoonan

Get Ṁ600 play money
Sort by:
bought Ṁ100 YES

Currently linked market has sum of John’s around 79% so there’s 8% of arbitrage available for the taking!

bought Ṁ125 YES
predicts YES

What if the next leader is named "Jon"?

@JosephNoonan Going for that Jon(i) Ernst angle? Unfortunately she would not count for the purposes of this market.

(I wrote that comment before realizing that Command + F was lying to me,,, but the same principle applies, only “John”s count)

predicts YES

@JoshuaB That looks like it's just a misspelling of her name. I meant if someone whose name is Jon, but without the H. I noticed when looking on the list of Republican whips that the third-most-recent was Jon Kyl: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Kyl

Obviously, he won't be the leader, since he's retired, but what if a new Jon rises to power?

@JosephNoonan Yeah, that won't count. The name must be John.

(The reason Joni appeared as Jon is since Command + F for Jon was covering up the i in her name)

predicts YES

@JosephNoonan That article is actually where I got John Barasso as a candidate from. Before I was just going to include John Thune and John Cornyn as the most recent Republican whips.

you could’ve titled this market “Will John be the next Republican Senate leader after Mitch McConnell?”

@Conflux You make an excellent point!

bought Ṁ6 of NO

@JoshuaB actually what would you think of removing “McConnell” for even greater stylistic consistency

@Conflux Well, then arguably if we get another Mitch, then is it really a different leader? Like, Mitch McConnell -> Mitch McDonalds -> John Johnward, who would even know how to resolve at that point??

Thouuugh, the stylistic point is somewhat compelling, I’ll think about it

predicts NO

@JoshuaB good point. it would be too ambiguous that the entire site would freeze

More related questions