Resolution Poll: Was "Disagreement around filling board vacancies" a significant factor in Sam Altman's firing?
25
resolved Dec 21
Yes
No
See Results

This is one in a series of polls which resolve a variant of the main Sam Altman Firing Market:

I leave it up to the voters to define what they consider a significant factor. Each option will resolve independently to yes/no depending on which option gets more votes in these polls.

I'm not sure if a poll is the best way to resolve markets around a mysterious event like this, but I think it's good for us to try out a lot of different formats so that we will better know what works for next time there is a mysterious event in the news.

I encourage you to write out your reasoning for your votes in the comments here or in the linked market.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:

This is one of the questions I'm not sure how to vote on. I believe this answer was added to the main market because of the first NYT article on the firing, which had this quote:

Does this rise to the level of being a significant factor? It's somewhat tied up in the overall struggle for board control that culminated in the attempts to oust Toner and then the counter-attempt to oust Sam. This could really come down to your definition of "significant".

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules