Resolves yes if before the end of this term (Jan 3. 2025), there is a motion to vacate McHenry as speaker while McHenry is speaker pro tempore and is introduced and voted upon.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ58 | |
| 2 | Ṁ16 | |
| 3 | Ṁ14 | |
| 4 | Ṁ9 | |
| 5 | Ṁ6 |
People are also trading
@DanPowell only a vote similar to McCarthy's vote, to remove McHenry as speaker pro tempore.
E.g. If McHenry works with democrats to pass a bipartisan bill, Gaetz tries to remove McHenry through a vote.
Would not resolve yes, if they elect a speaker.
Please define the terms a bit more clearly. A "motion to vacate" isn't a specific defined thing, although when there was a regular elected Speaker the press had defined it as roughly "a resolution causing a vacancy in the office of Speaker". But the office of Speaker is already vacant. What resolution would qualify? Also, what does "there is a motion to vacate" mean -- it is introduced? Voted upon? Raised as a question of privilege?