Should Manifold Markets implement this feature: Resolution Bonds
3
100Ṁ86resolved Feb 3
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
This feature would allow market creators to post a bond when creating a market. If the market it resolved poorly (more on that later), the market creator loses the bond.
The rationale for this feature is that, as a market creator, I want to encourage people to participate in my markets by showing that I'll resolve it honestly. Or, to look at it from the trader's perspective, I might see a very lopsided market where I believe I can make a lot of M$, but only if the market creator resolve the market honestly.
I think reputation is the first line of defense against "bad" market resolutions. If you resolve a market in a way that is obviously wrong, or self-serving, you'll lose your reputation and people will stop participating in your markets. I see the bond idea as a complement to this, because it allows a market to creator to pledge M$ in addition to their reputation. It also allows potential market creators to "bootstrap" their reputation: to start with, they have no reputation (because they're unknown), so they can post large bonds with their markets. After they've resolved many markets, they'll develop a good reputation, and that will presumably keep them honest.
The obvious thorny problem, and largest barrier I see to implementing this feature, is how to judge when a market has been resolved poorly. I see two options so far:
1. Allow market participants to judge the resolution after the market has closed. Only allowing people who had participated in the market before it closed would be allowed to vote, which would somewhat mitigate the brigading problem (e.g., if a market is resolved against you, you ask your friends to vote against the resolution). There would still be a risk that any market with a bond is always resolved in favour of the majority opinion (because they can outvote the market creator)
2. The bond specifies who the appellate judge is. That is, if market participants contest a resolution after the fact, there is a pre-selected user who will be asked to decide if the market was resolved fairly or not
3. Some kind of market-based mechanism, where contesting a market creates a new market to judge whether or no the first market was resolved fairly.
See here for a feature request for proposing questions for someone else to judge: https://manifold.markets/JiaobeiMandos/should-manifold-markets-implement-t-d5da24049b2ee
Resolution: I commit to resolving this question according to whichever option gets the most support (i.e., "no" if %chance is less than 50, "yes" if % chance is greater than 50, and "N/A" if % chance is exactly 50). See here for a request to make this kind of thing a feature: https://manifold.markets/JiaobeiMandos/should-manifold-markets-implement-t)
#ManifoldMarkets #FeatureRequest
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ36 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will Manifold implement another way to handle conditional markets before 2026?
39% chance
When will Manifold Markets allow users to partially resolve multiple choice markets
Will Manifold ever stop misresolving their own markets?
82% chance
When will the final resolved market on Manifold be resolved?