Will Manifold Markets developers acknowledge that having separate money pools for YES and NO is a problem before May 1?
18
310
resolved Mar 21
Resolved
YES
See discussions on Discord for more information Mar 20, 5:10pm: Also resolves YES if they acknowledge that having separate money pools for each answer in a free-response market is a problem.
Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ155
2Ṁ23
3Ṁ11
4Ṁ1
5Ṁ1
Sort by:
bought Ṁ300 of YES
Ok, I acknowledge it. Part of the reason for the current implementation is a legacy hangover from the previous DPM system, and part is because I wanted to penalize sellers (because in DPM, they are removing liquidity). But I think moving to one pool is probably for the best. I'll get around to implementing this eventually.
bought Ṁ20 of YES
I reckon the CFMM rollout means, well YES
bought Ṁ20 of YES
It is a quite obvious problems resulting in many silly results. Though it is dwarfed by problem that it does not matter at all when someone bought shares - when it was hard to predict or when outcome become obvious.
bought Ṁ1 of NO
lotto
bought Ṁ1 of YES
Yes, that counts
bought Ṁ1 of YES
Does it count if they acknowledge it has problems but decide to stick with it anyway?