Will Manifold Markets developers acknowledge that having separate money pools for YES and NO is a problem before May 1?
18
310
Ṁ5.3Kresolved Mar 21
Resolved
YES1D
1W
1M
ALL
See discussions on Discord for more information
Mar 20, 5:10pm: Also resolves YES if they acknowledge that having separate money pools for each answer in a free-response market is a problem.
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ155 | |
2 | Ṁ23 | |
3 | Ṁ11 | |
4 | Ṁ1 | |
5 | Ṁ1 |
Sort by:
Ok, I acknowledge it.
Part of the reason for the current implementation is a legacy hangover from the previous DPM system, and part is because I wanted to penalize sellers (because in DPM, they are removing liquidity). But I think moving to one pool is probably for the best. I'll get around to implementing this eventually.
Related questions
Related questions
Will Manifold natively facilitate micro-payments from market creators to users that trade on their markets by end of 2024?
16% chance
Will Manifold Markets impose a cap on total number of markets each user are allowed to created in 2024?
13% chance
Will Manifold encourage or force users to resolve markets before deleting their account?
3% chance
Will Manifold Love let anyone create markets again before June?
2% chance
If Manifold decides to test markets with a "Spending Cap" by July, will Manifold users think it was a good decision?