Only counts Manifold removing the badge from an individual because they were deemed unworthy. If the badge is removed entirely, this market resolves N/A. (Unless someone was stripped of it first of course.)
If the badge is renamed, this market still tracks that badge.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ482 | |
| 2 | Ṁ112 | |
| 3 | Ṁ106 | |
| 4 | Ṁ74 | |
| 5 | Ṁ43 |
@NGK Please limit the amount of dunking on Isaac. I know we could all chaos dunk on him until the cows come home, but that’s the problem: we’re ALL capable of doing it. Turns into like dudes all burning him like a college kid making ramen.
@CadeMataya The creator of this market was verified when creating it, and was the one who caused this to resolve to yes when he got stripped of his trustworthiness (and thats another story)
As far as I'm aware this is the first time a trustworthyish user's market has had to get resolved by someone else.
https://manifold.markets/Yev/will-ammonlam-be-trustworthyish-by
I think @TheSkeward is a good candidate. They failed to resolve this market according to the originally stated criteria, refused to clarify the actual criteria when multiple people asked, appear to be planning to profit off of their bad communication, and seem to have blocked me simply for being one of the people to ask them about their interpretation.
Of course this all depends on whether @Austin think this is actually an issue. I still don't understand how the trustworthyish badge decisions get made, but "is clear and responsive about market resolution criteria" doesn't seem to have been a big factor in the past.
Also note that even if @Duncn's badge was removed intentionally, it won't count for this market because it happened prior to creation.