Resolution criteria
This market will resolve to "Yes" if, by the end date, a plurality of traders agree that Madleen's interception was an "attack." The determination will be based on the number Yes and No traders on this market.
Update 2025-06-09 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has indicated they will probably resolve this market when the 'main attack market' resolves. The plurality of traders would then be assessed at that time.
Traders on this market or traders on the “parent” market? I sounds like here like we should vote in the comments?
@PaulBenjaminPhotographer if they were pepper sprayed that probably counts. That's the part I'm waiting on for confirmation.
@PaulBenjaminPhotographer if a traffic stop was performed by someone with no jurisdiction I bet you’d feel differently.
@KevinCurry I wasn't clear, I was more hoping for some self reflection as to why you thought there was any question about the legitimacy of the capture (bonus - it was *required*).
Is there a source in your life that is giving you bad information?
'I don't like it so it must be illegal'?
Was the boat travelling and not driving therefore does not require a license?
Just basic ignorance?
"The force maintaining the blockade may be stationed at a distance determined by military requirements" vs "Not in International Waters™" - one of these phrases appears in the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea, 12 June 1994 (para 96).