What's the 'public interest' case for this market?
Death markets are gross but most people tolerate them because of their obvious material and political impact on the world (at least, that's how I rationalise them, although I don't participate in them)
So what's the case here? Charles still has a generally accepted right to medical privacy. I think this market is gross in the same way that his death markets are gross, but my sense is that this is more transgressive for less benefit.
"A type of bladder cancer known as a urothelial carcinoma could also show up in the prostate.
That sort of bladder cancer is the most likely non-prostate cancer to be found as part of treatment for an enlarged prostate, said Dr. Scott Eggener, a urological oncologist at the University of Chicago. The inner lining of the bladder has becomes cancerous and spreads through the urinary tube, he explained. The cancer can be found during the prostate treatment “when you scrape away the prostate from the inside.""
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/health/king-charles-cancer-diagnosis.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/king-charles-diagnosed-cancer-rcna137293 "Separately, Buckingham Palace said Charles did not have prostate cancer."