Resolves whenever MAA posts cutoffs for AMC 10A. This will be based on the MAA AMC 10/12 scoring algorithm based on 0 WA/1.5 Blank/6 Correct for all answers, a 25-question exam, specifically the AMC 10A 2025. Resolution date is uncertain as MAA has a habit of being late with posting AIME cutoffs. There is NO void for question 25 (this is not the 12A, it's the 10A)
Update 2025-12-08 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The market will resolve based on the official MAA release of cutoffs, not unofficial sources or user-posted data.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ3,805 | |
| 2 | Ṁ3,036 | |
| 3 | Ṁ3,009 | |
| 4 | Ṁ1,533 | |
| 5 | Ṁ559 |
People are also trading
@johnNZOy Could be many reasons, I personally suspect cheating is the main one.
See https://maa.edvistas.com/eduview/report.aspx?self=&view=1561&mode=6×tamp=20251215184837949 for a very suspicious score distribution
@ZandaZhu The AoPS user who put that in seems to have accidentally mistaken the 2024 cutoff release for the 2025 cutoff release.
@ZandaZhu they may have used averaging on those and got confused, ima wait for the official maa release
@ZandaZhu I find it suspicious since the edits were made by a user named Aimeguesser just hours after the page was unlocked by admin, see https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=AMC_historical_results&diff=prev&oldid=271831
The cutoffs they provided were reasonable with the exception of the 12A (82.5 is ridiculously low considering everyone received a +6 boost)
@lw202277 considering that <80 cutoffs have happened - 76.5 last year if im not mistaken - even that's plausible... im waiting on MAA aime results page to come
@ZandaZhu these are replica with some incorrect ""void"" bumps bc the guy confused amc 10/12 from last year's amc10a cuts
@EvanWang11j3 Later parts are quite easy, but the early part didn't particularly get easier relatively and that probably matters more. I'd say 93 might be a bit over.