This is not a market about whether the trial WILL BE televised.
Judge Chutkan has asked Donald Trump to take a position.
Trump says YES, he doesn't object to the trial being televised, then this resolves YES.
Trump says NO, he doesn't want the trial televisied, it resolves NO.
If there is an ambiguous or no answer, then this will resolve N/A. Trump's answer must be very clear to get a resolution.
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1717969875140751534
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ311 | |
| 2 | Ṁ131 | |
| 3 | Ṁ53 | |
| 4 | Ṁ32 | |
| 5 | Ṁ28 |
@FrederickNorris I have a conflict of interest, but this seems to meet the criteria for YES.
@MickBransfield You posted an article with an alternate storyline, but this seems widely reported by now.
@FrederickNorris The story evolved as it unfolded. I think you resolved this question correctly.
@MickBransfield I didn't look at the primary sources, which is why I wanted some back-up. But the new reporting seemed consistent. (Also, I'm not sure it's a conflict for play money! We're just having fun here.)
He's showing a pretty consistent desire to get on air.
However, prosecutors indicated in their Friday night submission that Trump’s team asked them to convey that he “takes no position” on the matter.
@MickBransfield I think today is the deadline, so I'll wait a bit before resolving it N/A.
Good lookin' out, Mick!
@mattyb I agree, but I think he will get advice to the contrary, and he might be getting nervous enough at this point to take such advice.
@FrederickNorris He might want to be able to portray what goes on in the courtroom without the burden of recorded facts.