I will run an Arxiv search for papers published any time in 2024 which mention "LK-99" or "LK99". If there are ever ten or more results for this term within this period, then this market resolves YES
Past results:
Results on arxiv advanced search for "LK-99" or "LK99"
From 2023-07-01 to 2023-08-01: 1 (the original paper)
From 2023-08-01 to 2023-09-01: 49
From 2023-09-01 to 2023-10-01: So far, zero as of 9/3
Exact search I am running:
If reasonable improvements to my search are revealed, we may have to NA this market, since the historical examples etc. may have been invalidated. Please comment if you think I am missing papers in how I am conducting this search.
I am aware I am possibly double-counting the last day of the month, although in this case it doesn't matter.
Update 2025-05-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Clarification on Resolution Criteria:
The search will only consider the initial submission date of papers.
Updates to existing papers that reset the submission date will not be counted as new publications in 2024.
1,000
3.00I'm sorry that during the original setup I hadn't realized that authors can update papers which would reset the date field I had used in the query. This leads us to the situation now:
There are 7 papers which originally were submitted in the interval (2024)
But there are 10 papers which were UPDATED or submitted during the interval.
Sense-wise, that suggests a NO since the title is "published" and it's not reasonable to say that if you submit a paper in 2023, which would fall into the search query given in the description, and then you update it in 2024, that you have also published a paper in 2024. i.e. when asked what years you published papers you have to say "2023", you can't say "2023 and 2024" because if asked "how many papers did you publish" you still have to answer "1" and you can't publish a single paper in two separate years.
I did say: "If reasonable improvements to my search are revealed, we may have to NA this market, since the historical examples etc. may have been invalidated. Please comment if you think I am missing papers in how I am conducting this search."
I think that adjusting the search to include only the initial publication time is completely within the spirit of the claim. But that would lead to me returning NO.
Sense-wise, NO here seems perfect since clearly the claim that LK-99 would die down turned out to be true, which matches NO. Therefore I'm going to NO.
@Ernie the time to clarify this was months ago and not to change the exact query you said you would use.
Arχiv doesn’t “publish” in the traditional sense, authors just submit things and they appear. If the resolution criteria includes updates to previous posts this is a YES, if it only includes newly submitted manuscripts this is a NO. There’s no traditional submission -> revision -> publication process since it's not a journal.
@LiamZ the resolution seems to be tied to the proposed query, which includes updates... it also IMHO is mostly in spirit (updates indicate ongoing interest)
@AIBear eh, I don't think these search results indicate much ongoing interest at all if you look through them individually but that's outside the scope here.
Looking at https://arxiv.org/search/?query=%22LK-99%22+OR+%22LK99%22&searchtype=all&source=header I see two in December, one in November, three in October, and three in September, .... so it looks plausible that we could have ten in 2024.
@duck_master interest should fade though.
Don't know if the current hype around the new preprint claiming to have observed the Meissner effect will change that.