What % agreement will my description of fascism as "agricultural landlordism in decay" get here?
6
100Ṁ57resolved Jul 15
Resolved
01H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Vote in the comments. I originally phrased it as "feudalism in decay", but this would exclude Argentina.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ68 | |
| 2 | Ṁ19 | |
| 3 | Ṁ3 | |
| 4 | Ṁ1 | |
| 5 | Ṁ0 |
People are also trading
Sort by:
@BionicD0LPH1N There's no blogpost. But think about it.
"I'm not sure why fascism would be "agricultural landlordism in decay"."
Consider historical context -Japan, Italy, Prussia, Argentina, etc. were all famous for agricultural landlordism. But that world was dying, and landed elites and their supporters were thinking of the next thing. South Korea is a particularly drastic example -it had a huge amount of agricultural landlordism under Japanese rule, which was then destroyed totally after the Korean war. What came next is completely unsurprising from the standpoint of this dictum.
@EnopoletusHarding That sounds like you're saying fascism is caused by agricultural landlordism in decay, which is different from being it.