[M500 subsidy] If manifold.love uses free-form markets, is it more prone than manifold to offensive/harassing markets?
9
111
Ṁ319Ṁ781
May 31
1D
1W
1M
ALL
58%
Yes
39%
Yes, and it will be sufficiently moderated
25%
Yes, and it will Not be sufficiently moderated
41%
No
IF manifold-love uses free form markets, will it be significantly/noticeably more prone than manifold-markets to offensive or harassing markets?
(This is about markets, not comments or DMs)
This question is about the effects of free-form markets IF they are added to manifold-love. This question assumes free-form markets will have been added.
Free form markets means market creation similar to manifold-markets, where users can make their own questions (users are not limited to a fixed set of questions).
If manifold-love does not add free form markets by question close, this market will resolve N/A.
(question time may be extended if there is a reason to).
Multibinary: Answer percentages are independent.
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
Does Manifold approve the restrictions on the probability range on some markets ?
43% chance
Will Manifold encourage or force users to resolve markets before deleting their account?
3% chance
Will the Manifold Partner program be changed to incentivize high quality markets?
53% chance
Will Manifold allow market creators to noticeably prohibit themselves from trading on their own markets?
76% chance
Will Manifold give users better options to hide unimportant markets?
28% chance
Are manifold market creator ratings subject to reputation inflation?
POLL
Will manifold implement a "continuous" market?
16% chance
Will Manifold users stop requesting changes to Manifold.markets by way of market creation by 2026?
7% chance
How might Manifold become “markets for reputation”?
Ṁ0 bounty
Will manifold implement a policy whereby suggestions on discord will be encouraged to have an associated market?
67% chance