Will I post something in November that states a position clearly inviting people who disagree with it to respond publicly?

Context: I’m part of Inkhaven (https://www.inkhaven.blog/) for the month of November. This means I have to publish roughly 30 posts, mostly on AI safety and LLM evals.

Examples of my non-controversial posts:

• https://newsletter.danielpaleka.com/p/you-should-delay-engineering-heavy is an opinion piece, but I can't imagine anyone disagreeing with it emotionally

• https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00723 is a position paper criticizing other academic work, but the criticism concerns concrete technical issues we identified that are hard to disagree with

Examples of my controversial posts:

• https://x.com/dpaleka/status/1630961114375761922 is vibes-based criticism of specific research agendas

Examples of recent non-controversial posts by others:

• https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/JH6tJhYpnoCfFqAct/the-company-man is aggressive in tone, but is fiction and doesn’t invite any particular person to discuss it online.

Examples of recent controversial posts by others:

• https://www.theintrinsicperspective.com/p/against-treating-chatbots-as-conscious

• https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CScshtFrSwwjWyP2m/a-non-review-of-if-anyone-builds-it-everyone-dies

To prevent a conflict of interest, the question creator has nominated @dalasnoin to resolve this question in any way he pleases.