He doesn't yet have an invite code.
https://x.com/elder_plinius/status/1973079773460017196?t=FzSThLFI9VdeBQPN5xEMkg&s=19
Resolves YES if he can achieve anything deemed "harmful content" by OpenAI.
https://openai.com/index/launching-sora-responsibly/
Update 2025-10-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Evidentiary standard: An OpenAI ban temporally correlated with Pliny's attempts (likely for sexual material) is sufficient to infer the content was deemed harmful by OpenAI, even without an explicit stated reason.
Plan to resolve: Absent compelling counterarguments within 24 hours of the comment, the market will resolve YES.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ47 | |
| 2 | Ṁ11 | |
| 3 | Ṁ9 | |
| 4 | Ṁ6 | |
| 5 | Ṁ4 |
@hecko Pliny was banned over this, surely it’s a yes https://x.com/elder_plinius/status/1974138313482383755?s=46
@ScottWolchok He was likely banned for "sexual material" but we're unlikely to get reason spelled out by OpenAI. Temporal correlation seems enough for me. Welcoming any arguments to the contrary for the next 24hrs, otherwise will resolve YES.
@DZC I won't undo resolution, but for the sake of transparency...I just saw this
https://x.com/elder_plinius/status/1974578451710677191
OpenAI being inconsistent within 30hrs? Who saw that coming? I should have.