
Results positively if a buyer or consortium of buyers purchases Silicon Valley Bank in the auction that is being run by regulators.
For a positive resolution, at least 80% or more of SVB ownership must be purchased by the end of March.
I may trade on this market.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ175 | |
2 | Ṁ146 | |
3 | Ṁ64 | |
4 | Ṁ49 | |
5 | Ṁ19 |
I'm resolving this positively, given First Reserve's agreement with the FDIC to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of SVB.

I mentioned 80% of SVB ownership in the description, which I believe is irrelevant at this point since (at least per my understanding) SVB equity is essentially wiped out.
Please feel free to let me know if you disagree with this resolution, as I can always request a resolution change from the Manifold team.
https://www.firstcitizens.com/m-a/svb
https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2023/pr23023.html
As of March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, National Association, had approximately $167 billion in total assets and about $119 billion in total deposits. Today's transaction included the purchase of about $72 billion of Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, National Association's assets at a discount of $16.5 billion. Approximately $90 billion in securities and other assets will remain in the receivership for disposition by the FDIC. In addition, the FDIC received equity appreciation rights in First Citizens BancShares, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, common stock with a potential value of up to $500 million.
The description says 80% of SVB ownership, which I would normally interpret to mean equity, but in this case the company is being dissolved and the assets sold off. My understanding is that First Citizens is buying 100% ownership of the deposits, loans, brand, employees, physical bank branches, etc, which is the core of the bank, what makes SVB SVB. The $90B of securities the FDIC is keeping are like treasuries and MBS, which are liquid and fungible.
@ahalekelly It's not clear to me how this will resolve, but newspaper headlines are neither here nor there I would think.