
Critiques of Jill Biden dissertation have mainly highlighted the following points:
Academic Rigor: Some commentators argue that the dissertation lacks the depth and scholarly rigor typically expected of a doctoral thesis .
Writing Quality: There have been criticisms regarding the writing style and clarity of the dissertation, with some describing it as poorly written and weakly argued .
Purpose and Content: The content and objectives of the dissertation have also been questioned, with some suggesting it reads more like an extended opinion piece rather than a robust academic study .
Outrageous accusations, both Joe and Jill and first class scholars. I have actually read (ok, skimmed) Dr Biden's dissertation and I think it is wholly suitable for an Ed.D. from the University of Delaware, which itself is a top 1% school in the world.
And then of course there's this:
1988 Presidential Campaign Incident
During his 1988 bid for the Democratic presidential nomination, Biden was accused of plagiarizing parts of a speech by British Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock. The controversy arose when Biden used Kinnock's speech lines and personal anecdotes without proper attribution. Kinnock's speech included references to his family's background and hardships, which Biden adopted almost verbatim, making only minor adjustments to fit his own story.