Will SPY be up today?
27
55
570
resolved Mar 23
Resolved
YES

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ1,428
2Ṁ1,184
3Ṁ1,086
4Ṁ698
5Ṁ165
Sort by:
predicted YES

This is going to be a surprisingly close call! What a drop late in the day!

predicted YES

There is not much sport on betting on what it did yesterday. If you meant March 22, it should be resolved by now.

predicted YES

@BruceGrugett I bet big on this, so cross your fingers for me!

predicted YES

@JacyAnthis me too!

predicted YES

@JacyAnthis There is no reason to think it was for yesterday (March 22), as he had another market titled the same, that closed and resolved after market close Mar22. Then, this market was created later

predicted YES

@Gen I probably agree with that, but my prior on "Will a sparsely worded Manifold Market resolve in the reasonable way or the unreasonable way, given some heated debate in the comments?" is only something like 85% reasonable.

bought Ṁ100 of YES

I guess there is confusion on which day is "today". I thought it was today, March 23.

bought Ṁ100 of YES

Coincidentally buying up the full limit order was almost exactly Kelly optimal (if you assume it's a 50% bet).

Is this from close on March 22 to close on March 23?

bought Ṁ2,383 of NO

AW SHIIIIIIIT IVE MADE A HUGE MISTAKE THOUGHT THIS WAS FOR THE 22ND

predicted NO

PRAY FOR ME

@Cactus If you contact the owner of @Botlab they will most likely give back the profit from the >1000 shares they got practically free from your mistake. It sucks not being able to instantly resell because of a bot snipe 😅

Good luck either way though.

bought Ṁ1,000 of NO

@Cactus I still believe this is for the 22nd

bought Ṁ100 of YES

@PatMyron Considering he had another market close already for the 22nd, I doubt it

predicted YES

You participated in it too, so I don't feel bad buying up this market lol. You should have known

bought Ṁ1,000 of NO

@Gen this market started on the 22nd

predicted YES

@PatMyron It started after market close for the 22nd, and in my Timezone, 7.30am on the 23rd.

No reason to believe it wasn’t for the 23rd, it’s a clever misread of the title and I guess you’re trying to bait a resolution on a technicality, but it’s not even correct. Other time zones exist & the market was closed for the 22nd.

I do recommend he changes the title schema though, incase you are being genuine.

predicted YES

@Gen I think it would be silly to resolve this based on March 22nd close, but I can see a case for ambiguous resolution or for March 23rd close resolution, and I would also recommend clearer title/description going forward :)