1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ228 | |
| 2 | Ṁ73 | |
| 3 | Ṁ38 | |
| 4 | Ṁ33 | |
| 5 | Ṁ0 |
People are also trading
@DanPowell Isn’t this breaking the TOS to manipulate the resolution of the market, rather than to “resolve” it?
Maybe I’m misunderstanding the question, but it reads to me like this is about the creator of a market violating TOS in order to determine what the resolution to market should be, for example, if somebody spammed API request in order to gather the data, they need to result in market.
Can you clarify @BenjaminIkuta?
@DanPowell Lol, is that actually a TOS violation? It's pretty clearly not serious.
Also, didn't expect this to go meta, but I suppose there's no reason not to.
@BenjaminIkuta It's very clearly parody, I don't think Twitter considers parody to be against TOS
The TOS https://twitter.com/en/tos state you may not violate the Rules and Policies. There is a rule against impersonation:
“Impersonation
You may not pose as an existing person, group, or organization to mislead others about who you are or who you represent. Accounts that violate this policy will misrepresent their identity by using at least two elements of another identity, such as the name, image, or false claims of affiliation with another individual or organization in their profile or posts.”
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/x-impersonation-and-deceptive-identities-policy
Parody, Commentary, or Fan Accounts
Accounts that depict another person, group, or organization in their profile to discuss, satirize, or share information about that entity are not in violation of this policy. While these accounts may use elements of another’s identity, they also include profile language or other indicators that inform people on X that the account is not affiliated with the subject of the profile.
To avoid confusing others about an account’s affiliation, Parody, Commentary, and Fan accounts must distinguish themselves in their account name and in their bio. Accounts that fail to sufficiently distinguish themselves are considered non-compliant and in violation of this policy.
The account meets all the criteria
I think the photo would count as 1. I don’t think the profile display name or username would count. So unless something changes (and there’s nothing in the description that says the action must occur before market close), it looks like it comes down to whether the contents of the tweet constitute a second infraction
NVM, the profile pic doesn’t count either, as it’s AI generated, not a photo. The bio does state “Satire”, as Shump mentions. So not only does it fail the impersonation criteria, it also meets the parody criteria.
@BenjaminIkuta No, it would just have to happen before resolution. You could resolve it at any point when there was no violation under discussion
@Shump Twitter reinstated this account with the provision that it make no claim to be the person satirized.
@BenjaminIkuta Did X support respond to your report? The number of views is consistent with nobody except manifold users ever seeing it.
This already happened, didn't it?
https://manifold.markets/LukeMcredmond/will-irisigb-cross-25k-twitterx-fol
@BenjaminIkuta only issue is that it happened before this market was created, and the market language seems to imply that this should happen in the future
Yeah that instance definitely happened, but it was before this market iirc.