Which configuration will be chosen for the Einstein Telescope?
2
243Ṁ50
2030
27%
Triangle (one site)
27%
Double ell (two sites)
27%
The project will be cancelled before either configuration is chosen
19%
Other

Triangle: three interferometers, each with a 60° angle between its arms, forming an equilateral triangle (with two parallel interferometer arms along each side) of 10 km radius

Double ell: two interferometers, each with a 90° angle between its arms, at two different sites several hundred kilometres away, with 45° angles between the arms of the two different interferometers

The triangle configuration allows three interferometers to be deployed by only boring three tunnels, and allows all three to be in the geologically optimal place; the double ell configuration requires four tunnels to be bored to deploy only two interferometers, but it would provide a better localization of events, and would allow the two sites to be in different countries, which might be politically advantageous (as each funding agency might be more willing to fund an experiment at least partly in its own country)

(Actually, the triangle configuration would comprise three pairs of interferometers parallel to each other, each with one for high frequencies and one for low frequencies, and the double ell would likewise comprise two pairs of interferometers)

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

the double ell configuration ... would allow the two sites to be in different countries

(well, a triangle could still be in two countries if it straddled an international border, like the LHC does, or even three countries if it surrounded a tripoint, but a double ell would be the only way for ET to be both in Sardinia and in Meuse-Rhine, or both in Sardinia and in Saxony)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules