Will Destiny cover the Mr. Girl Manifesto on stream?
1.2k
943
7k
resolved Apr 5
Resolved
YES

Within two weeks of release. Market resolves "No" if there is no manifesto by the end of 2023.

Edit 1/7/2023: For this market to resolve "Yes" Destiny must either watch the video released by Mr. Girl or read the article. If Destiny reacts to someone watching the video or reading the article the market will also resolve "Yes". Short clips will not count, Destiny must actively review the manifesto on stream.

Edit 3/13/2023: Due to length and nature of manifesto evolving extensively, I'm going to offer a final clarification to this market. There is probably no criteria which will satisfy everyone, but I think this update embodies the original spirit of the market and remains in line with the previous update. In addition, I also think it's likely that it will be obvious once the dust has settled which direction the market should resolve. This market will resolve YES only if Destiny makes an effort to read, discuss, respond, or listen to the breadth of the article. Given the article's extensive length, singling out only a handful of particular sections (even if the sections are the most rhetorically significant) will not count. However, seeing as it is unrealistic that Destiny will read all 100+ pages of the article on stream, an engagement which involves skimming through the entire article, or skipping sections he finds irrelevant or uninteresting will still count towards YES. He does not need to respond to every point in the article, nor does he have to finish it, but if he engages with the larger revelations and analysis the market will resolve YES. Extensive discussion of the article will only count towards YES if that discussion encompasses a breadth of the article's content.

Get Ṁ600 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ14,504
2Ṁ11,869
3Ṁ6,507
4Ṁ4,521
5Ṁ4,263
Sort by:
predicted NO

i still dont understand this

predicted YES

@jojomonsta7777 he covered it

predicted YES

Le epic

Thank christ I sold in time

predicted YES

It's so funny watching people try to justify their no position when it was obvious from the initial stream that it was going to resolve yes. Bizzaro world.

predicted NO

Fair enough. Coulda seen it going either way. Props to those diamond hands out there 💎🙌

predicted NO

I take pleasure in knowing so many people sold their Yes shares or stop buying more Yes Shares to make more money because of me.

predicted YES

@johnleoks spite-based politics smh

predicted YES

@johnleoks Feel bad for this dude 😭

predicted YES

@PunishedFurry @scoobysnaccer you should have had diamond hands

WEAK

predicted YES

@Shah rude...

predicted YES

lmao he actually did it. rules lawyers seething rn

predicted YES

wait why the fuck am i not the top trader REE I made more than @PunishedFurry

predicted YES

@Shah WE DID IT BROTHAAAA

predicted YES

@PunishedFurry :D

ngl i was prepared to write a mini schizo festo detailing out every time Destiny talked about the mrgirl manifesto

predicted YES

YOU MOTHERFUCKER I WAS WAITING TO BUY MORE REE I WAS GONNA LET JOHNLEOKS AND GENZY SCHIZO OUT MORE REE

THANKS FOR THE MONEY THO

predicted NO

@Shah Lmao every time there was an update I was prepared for him to resolve YES. Somehow I forgor to consider that bro was literally watching YouTube videos and probably a full week behind what’s happening on stream 💀💀 at least it was a fun market.

When a market resolves at 50% (and hasn’t closed) that’s a big mark against the maker. No discussion at all and sudden resolution days after any relevant changes.

predicted NO

💀💀💀 keeping the market open just to mislead people even after meeting criteria 💀💀💀

predicted NO

lmao

predicted YES

How mad are you guys

predicted NO

@dacamell I'm only mad that the people in these comments spewing horrid things are getting what they want.

predicted YES

He does not need to respond to every point in the article, nor does he have to finish it, but if he engages with the larger revelations and analysis the market will resolve YES. Extensive discussion of the article will only count towards YES if that discussion encompasses a breadth of the article's content.

Being that he watched and responded/reacted a reading of it for several hours and vods of it uploaded to youtube , disputed the false claims in the article, providing context and all of the misleading framings, and admitting his fault to accurate criticisms in the article, arguments in favor of resolving no are operating under a heavy dose of copium.

predicted NO

@pearagon Copy pasting my past responses to the "omg look he spent hours sitting there in autopilot droning through Chud's stream" argument.

Out of all the arguments from the YES buyers, the time argument is the weakest. If Chud spent 10 hours to go over 10% of the article and Destiny reacts to all 10 hours, would this meet the criteria of resolving YES? I mean it's 10 hours right? I think we all know the answer to that.
Clearly, time spent doesn't matter. What matters is how much of the breadth of the article's he covered.

predicted YES

@johnleoks he gave as much attention to it as he does every other conversation he has while gaming, seethe and cope

predicted NO

@pearagon No argument? That's what I thought.

predicted YES

@johnleoks i dont need an argument when i have your money

predicted NO

@pearagon Your portfolio is less than 1k. Sit down lil bro.

predicted YES

@johnleoks im saving up to buy a chair