Referring to this statement:
This market resolves to the specific aspects of Jeremy Corbell's claims regarding UAPs and non-human craft. Each option can resolve independently Yes or No based on its specific truth.
I will use Wikipedia or a similar reliable source for resolution in case of ambiguity.
1. 100% True: Every element of Corbell's statement is accurate.
2. Reverse Engineering of Human-Origin Craft: There are craft being reverse-engineered, but they are of human origin.
3. Reverse Engineering by Non-U.S. Entities: There are non-human craft being reverse-engineered, but not by the U.S. government or its contractors.
4. Misinformation: Corbell has been misinformed or misled, making his statement incorrect.
5. Deliberate Falsehood: Corbell is knowingly spreading false information with the substance of the statement..
6. Existence of Non-Human Craft, Not Reverse Engineered: Non-human craft exist, but are not being reverse-engineered.
Non-Functional Non-Human Craft: Non-human craft exist but are not in working order.
Fragments of Non-Human Craft: Only fragments of non-human craft have been recovered, not entire, functional craft.
The market will resolve based on verifiable evidence, credible reports, or official statements that confirm or refute each proposition.
If significant other possibilities arise, I will add them here.