Will female height be correlated (more than 0.12) with any sexual fetish in the data from my kink survey?
22
676
111
resolved Jun 11
Resolved
NO
(a mirror of my other one asking about males here: https://manifold.markets/Aella/will-male-height-be-correlated-more, with a slightly higher correlation cutoff due to lower sample size) I tested for ~300 sexual fetishes (though many of them were questions that only appeared conditional on previous questions). I also asked about gender (including trans/cis) and height. The question is, will height in biological females correlate with interest in any sexual fetish? (Not adjusting for any confounders, but I do plan on throwing out things that seem underpowered/sus for any reason, such as realizing people were severely misinterpreting a question answer) Sample size in this dataset so far is around 3,700 Will resolve this market when I finally get all the data cleaned up to look at it, giving myself a month time limit (though likely much sooner)
Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ161
2Ṁ67
3Ṁ30
4Ṁ15
5Ṁ8
Sort by:
bought Ṁ20 of YES
With 300 variables, I'm pretty sure one will launch above 0.12. And even though it is probably obvious, you might want to specify what correlation measure you're going to use.
bought Ṁ100 of YES
raised back to 80%. after a bit of browsing, it seems like many weird things are correlated with height (https://polisci.osu.edu/sites/polisci.osu.edu/files/Height_Paper_bjps_submit.pdf, say), 300 is a lot, and without adjusting for other variables I find it likely that fetishes will correlate with age or heritage or something else that correlates with age
More data mining
bought Ṁ10 of YES
No idea about this, but seems weird to think it this would resolve differently from the market for men, so I'm arbing them.