Who rated me more "accurately" - people who didn't know me at all, or energy readers?
39
797
830
resolved Dec 4
100%62%
People who'd spent under 10 hours with me
38%
Energy readers

I did a survey asking people to rate me on ~40 traits. I asked how much time they'd spent with me, and:

"Are you an energy reader, or have similar near-mystical abilities to read the metaphysical-esque 'energy' off of people?"

I'm taking "accurate" here to mean "average ratings of people who've spent at least 10 hours or more with me"

The question is, which group aligned more closely (calculated by correlation of the avgs of all the answers from each group) to the "accurate" ratings - people who identified as "yes, very much" to the energy reader question, or people who had spent 0-10 hours with me?

(as of writing this, around 85 people are in the energy reader group)

Get Ṁ600 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ42
2Ṁ30
3Ṁ27
4Ṁ26
5Ṁ25
Sort by:
bought Ṁ50 of Energy readers YES

My guess is no difference. Before I bet, probabilities were at 15% energy readers/85% strangers so betting on energy readers is good odds

bought Ṁ10 of Energy readers YES

I should read before I bet...