Who rated me more "accurately" - people who didn't know me at all, or energy readers?
39
797
Ṁ1.3kṀ830
resolved Dec 4
1D
1W
1M
ALL
100%62%
People who'd spent under 10 hours with me
38%
Energy readers
I did a survey asking people to rate me on ~40 traits. I asked how much time they'd spent with me, and:
"Are you an energy reader, or have similar near-mystical abilities to read the metaphysical-esque 'energy' off of people?"
I'm taking "accurate" here to mean "average ratings of people who've spent at least 10 hours or more with me"
The question is, which group aligned more closely (calculated by correlation of the avgs of all the answers from each group) to the "accurate" ratings - people who identified as "yes, very much" to the energy reader question, or people who had spent 0-10 hours with me?
(as of writing this, around 85 people are in the energy reader group)
Get Ṁ600 play money
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ42 | |
2 | Ṁ30 | |
3 | Ṁ27 | |
4 | Ṁ26 | |
5 | Ṁ25 |
More related questions
Related questions
What's my IQ?
126
What's my IQ? [Ṁ500 subsidy]
136
Plasma's guessing game: Which works are my favorite?
Will I be able to predict my partner better than she can predict me? (M$50 bounty for good questions.)
50% chance
Are prediction markets more accurate than polls?
96% chance
What is your intuition about this probability comparison?
POLL
Which markets are more accurate?
POLL
What is your intuition about this probability comparison?
POLL
Which number is most likely overestimated?
POLL