Tomorrow I'll tweet asking "You'd rather lose the ability to sing or swear?"
Which one will get more votes?
edit: poll here https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1597729724460998656?t=0rHjp5QJSStD0L27ZeKy9w&s=19
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ466 | |
2 | Ṁ265 | |
3 | Ṁ91 | |
4 | Ṁ81 | |
5 | Ṁ75 |
@Aella An explanation is here, under "Variable pay out". To give my own explanation, in the DPM system used by multiple-choice markets like this one, rather than buying a "YES" share that pays out 1M$ if the result is YES or one "NO" share that pays out 1M$ if the result is "NO", instead you buy a "Swear" or "Sing" share which entitles you to a fixed fraction of the total money pool if the market resolves to "Swear" or "Sing". This means people who go to the poll and see that "Swear" has won can buy "Swear" and dilute the value of the "Swear" shares previously bought by other people. For that reason, it's nice to close the market before information about how it will resolve is made public, so that everyone buying shares works off of the same information.
@BoltonBailey For example, yesterday when the probability of "Swear" was 41% I bought 7 Shares of "Swear" for 5M$, and at the time, the "payout if chosen" was around 10M$. Now that many people are buying "Swear", my payout if "Swear" is chosen is only 8M$.
@AndrewG The team on Discord has said that an update is in the works which will make the multiple-choice markets more like the YES/NO markets.