Will resolve to multiple answers and you can add your own
To resolve YES, a person must be both on an Epstein list + indicted.
Fancy a game of guess who with a scandalous twisted Leftist? Who’s it going to be 😈??
Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Prince Andrew, Prince Charles, Jimmy Kimmel,
Oprah Winfrey,
Tom Pritzker, or another high-profile guest be the next to make headlines? Place your bets in our “list +indictment “ pool and join the ranks of the satirically savvy. Who’s your pick for the notorious black book's next chapter?" if you would like to add names, go ahead and tag them. I will add them if I don’t think that they are accurate and are guaranteed not complicit they will be removed as presumed innocent. Shits and googles satire.😉🤣😂 doubt it!
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ0 |
@traders This market was supposed to be like their poll /CaptainHowdy/what-names-are-going-to-come-up-on
I’m going to update the title/description to kill the old info. If you want this N/A’d instead, we can do that. Then @CaptainHowdy can duplicate again, the fixed version, and restart.
I gave poor instructions to shortcut creation by duplicating the old one and reducing the names, but I didn’t specify the title etc would need changing. I’ll update it, close it, and wait for trader response or Mike to decide to N/A on their own / accept my changes
@Gen I have “fixed” it - @CaptainHowdy check if you’re happy with the new title & description, then the best move is to probably resolve this market N/A to undo all costs/trades (I can do it for you, if you like) and then duplicate it again now that it is fixed
I notice this is a new market but this list (not clients, but associates and people mentioned in sealed court documents, from a ruling in December 2023) was made public in January in a series of PDFs so this should N/A
@shankypanky What does “cancel” mean here? Sorry, kinda a noob. Eg, should I sell the contract I have on YES, bill gates at a loss and I’ll automatically be credited back whatever I put in?
@AnandShah that's a valid question! when a market is resolved NA it's reversed as if the trades never happened. everyone gets their mana back automatically, so no need to worry about a loss. would be good to NA this sooner than later though since there are already multiple traders with their mana tied up here, so hopefully @CaptainHowdy sees this soon.
@shankypanky Ahhh it was supposed to be who will be indicted from the client list. I thought they could duplicate the old market and change the title, but I may not have been clear on how to do that 🥲
@Gen hmm - probably best to only have options of people who were on the list, though? why is Tiffany Gomas here? lol
also, the description/criteria shouldn't be duplicated from the old one - maybe they should take the old market, duplicate, remove anyone who resolved "no", and then create it? notably, there were people who resolved yes in the earlier markets because they were mentioned, but since it's all court transcriptions it's sometimes people where the witness was asked "what about xyz" and the reply was "no, never" for example. so, not everyone who may have qualified for showing up in the documents would even be in a position to be indicted.
also, it's not a client list.