Will any pharmacy chains stop distributing mifepristone as a result of the Texas injunction?
5
180
130
resolved May 9
Resolved
NO

I need it to be confirmed that all the below are true in order to resolve yes

1) the pharmacy is a chain (multiple locations)

2) the pharmacy was distributing mifepristone

3) the pharmacy stopped

4) the stop was because of the injunction

Get Ṁ600 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ47
2Ṁ13
3Ṁ11
Sort by:
predicted YES

Question here: should this resolve or reopen? Did people expect the close date to be real when they were betting? I'd assume yes

predicted YES

@samb Yeah, I thought they stopped because of the injunction, but I guess it was because of some letter? I'm fine, I won't object to resolution against me

To clarify 4 - does it count if they stop because of something related to the injunction, maybe they don't want to deal with the uncertainty or news or whatever around it, even if the injunction didn't legally require them to stop? For example if the injunction never goes into effect?

@jack Let me know if you have a better idea, but my current plan is to depend on statements made by the pharmacies themselves. If they say something like "due to legal uncertainty we are stopping", I would count that as a yes, since it's pretty clear that the uncertainty wouldn't exist without the injunction. If they just happen to stop without a public statement, I would not count that.