I need it to be confirmed that all the below are true in order to resolve yes
1) the pharmacy is a chain (multiple locations)
2) the pharmacy was distributing mifepristone
3) the pharmacy stopped
4) the stop was because of the injunction
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ47 | |
2 | Ṁ13 | |
3 | Ṁ11 |
@samb Yeah, I thought they stopped because of the injunction, but I guess it was because of some letter? I'm fine, I won't object to resolution against me
@jack Let me know if you have a better idea, but my current plan is to depend on statements made by the pharmacies themselves. If they say something like "due to legal uncertainty we are stopping", I would count that as a yes, since it's pretty clear that the uncertainty wouldn't exist without the injunction. If they just happen to stop without a public statement, I would not count that.