Each one resolves to YES if Joe Biden gets under 88% of the vote. If he gets 88% or more it resolves as NO and if the primary/caucus is not held or results are not available it will resolve as N/A
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ563 | |
| 2 | Ṁ77 | |
| 3 | Ṁ20 | |
| 4 | Ṁ12 | |
| 5 | Ṁ11 |
Alaska resolves no:
https://alaskademocrats.org/incumbent-president-joe-biden-wins-alaska-primary/
Pennsylvania resolves no:
https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/
Maryland resolves yes:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/results/2024/05/14/maryland-primary/
Oregon resolves yes:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/21/us/elections/results-oregon-primary.html
New Jersey resolves no:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/04/us/elections/results-new-jersey-primary.html
North Dakota resolves no:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-primary-elections/north-dakota-president-results
Nebraska resolved based on Nebraska.gov results: https://electionresults.nebraska.gov/resultsSW.aspx?text=Race&type=SW&map=CTY
Wikipedia lists this as 80.7%: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_New_York_Democratic_presidential_primary
Other sources say 90.5%: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/04/02/us/elections/results-new-york-democratic-presidential-primary.html
I think it's because Wikipedia is counting blank ballots, and other sources aren't? Would be nice to get the creator's input on this @mb
@mb I think this should be No, Wikipedia people don't have any more info than we do and imo it's a bit ridiculous to count blank ballots as its own category, if that were the case then a ton of downballot races would be won by "blank votes"
Ping them and wait out of courtesy.
If there is definitive proof posted for any of them, after a few days of no response from creator, I would happily resolve them as I am sure other mods would also.