N/a here automatically means there is no profit for @Dagonet at this realted market: https://manifold.markets/MaxE/will-dagonet-profit

@GeorgePetverd this is false.

@GeorgePetverd he already sold some of his shares before the market closed (betting in different directions) which means he has already pocketed that money.

@ZandaZhu No, When a market is n/a, it cancels all trades on the market that ever happened. So if you had sold for a profit it is taken back

I bet because there was over 20 hours for dagonets position to change. Now you closed it early. You can't do that.

@NzJack0n read the other comments

@johnNZOy resolve it n/a

@NzJack0n done

Huh? How can you close the market early?

@NzJack0n it had already closed and was re-opened for no apparent reason.

• The market was closed ~2 hours ago after reaching the creator’s stated threshold (69 mana bets requirement). ("This market will resolve when Dagonet bets 69 mana here, measured over all trades (aggregate), not from a single trade.")

• The creator then reopened trading without explanation, contrary to their own binding clarifications.

• Therefore, all trades executed after the reopen should be treated as invalid / not counted

Trades that SHOULD count (before closure)

NO (spent)

1. Ṁ16/Ṁ19 NO @72% (cancelled) → NO +16

2. Ṁ10/Ṁ12 NO @81% → NO +10

3. Ṁ6/Ṁ8 NO @87% → NO +6

NO total (counted): Ṁ32

YES (spent)

1. Ṁ21/Ṁ29 YES @36% (cancelled) → YES +21

2. Ṁ13/Ṁ16 YES @24% (cancelled) → YES +13

3. Ṁ21/Ṁ22 YES @33% (cancelled) → YES +21

4. Ṁ13/Ṁ18 YES @8% (cancelled) → YES +13

YES total (counted): Ṁ68

Totals that SHOULD count

• Total mana traded (counted): Ṁ100

• Counted NO: Ṁ32

• Counted YES: Ṁ68

Market was already closed; creator reopened without reason; these trades are post-closure and should be excluded.

Trades that should NOT count (after improper reopen)

(All NO after illegal reopening)

1. Ṁ39/Ṁ100 NO @45% (cancelled) → NO +39

2. Ṁ22/Ṁ100 NO @58% (cancelled) → NO +22

3. Ṁ12/Ṁ100 NO @36% (cancelled) → NO +12

4. Ṁ11/Ṁ100 NO @37% (cancelled) → NO +11

5. Ṁ8/Ṁ94 NO @38% (cancelled) → NO +8

Post-reopen total (excluded): Ṁ92 (all on NO)

Summary (your intended “official” counting - shall not count)

• Counted total: Ṁ100 (NO Ṁ32, YES Ṁ68)

• Excluded total (after reopen): Ṁ92 (NO Ṁ92, YES Ṁ0)

@GeorgePetverd I thought it would resolve when dagonet had 69 total mana bet or when the market reached its close time

@MaxE it needs to say "69 mana"

@GeorgePetverd Sorry for the bad explanation! I will try to clarify more in the description

@johnNZOy the market does resolve no if dagonet isnt holding 69 mana no at the time of resolution, right?

@MaxE no

@johnNZOy so it resolves no if dagonet holds 69 mana yes?

@MaxE Correct

@johnNZOy your title says ‘at least 69’, which dagonet crossed long ago. Your market already closed and should have resolved NO when it did.

@MachiNi I should have made it say that it had to be visible in the holders section.

@johnNZOy that’s never been what the market was about. Please resolve NO or N/A or we’ll ask @mods to do so.

@MachiNi ok

https://manifold.markets/MaxE/will-dagonet-profit?r=TWF4RQ

Why are you all betting down?

@johnNZOy because 100 MANA bets on YES/NO were reached before market closure. NO won, after this you illegally reopened the trades.

@johnNZOy when is this supposed to close? Why did you reopen the market?

@MachiNi When Dagonet’s total bets reached 69 MANA, .. And those had already reached 100 MANA total before initial expiration.

The market was expired, closed and must be resolved as NO, since Dagonet holds a position on the YES side.

@johnNZOy , Why did you reopen the market?

@MachiNi it closes when it says that dagonet has placed 69 mana worth of bets on 1 side.

@GeorgePetverd It must say that Dagonet has spent 69 mana in the holders section.

@johnNZOy @dagonet spent 100 MANA on bets before the market closed. Thank you for the final correct resolution: everything is good..

The only remaining issue is another market where people bet that Dagonet would not make a profit on this market. How that related market should be resolved now is still a mystery.